The Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009 is pending in both the Senate and the House. S931 is in the Senate Judiciary Committee and HR1020 is pending in the Commercial and Administrative Law Subcommittee of the House Committee on the Judiciary.

The Act, if passed, would overturn the 5-4 Supreme Court decision in 14 PENN PLAZA LLC v. PYETT, 556 U.S. ___ (2009), 129 S. Ct. 1456,  upholding arbitration clauses in collective bargaining agreement employment contracts waiving an employee's right to bring statutory claims in federal court.  The Act would also overturn the 5-4 decision in CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC. V. ADAMS, 532 U.S. 105 (2001), approving mandatory  arbitration agreements of employment law disputes in lieu of litigation.

The proposed Act invalidates pre-dispute mandatory arbitration agreements in employment, consumer, franchise, or civil rights disputes.  Support for the Act appears to be growing. The North American Securities Administrators Association supports the Act, although there is some stiff opposition, including the International Franchise Association. 

Views: 61

Comment

You need to be a member of WSBA Alternative Dispute Resolution to add comments!

Join WSBA Alternative Dispute Resolution

Latest Activity

Profile IconKen Lederman and Virginia M. Onu joined WSBA Alternative Dispute Resolution
Tuesday
Melanie Frizzell is now a member of WSBA Alternative Dispute Resolution
Nov 29
Craig Charles Beles updated their profile
Nov 12
Craig Charles Beles is attending WSBA ADR's event
Thumbnail

23rd Annual NWDR Conference at University of Washington School of Law

March 23, 2017 to March 24, 2017
Nov 12

© 2016   Created by WSBA ADR.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service