The Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009 is pending in both the Senate and the House. S931 is in the Senate Judiciary Committee and HR1020 is pending in the Commercial and Administrative Law Subcommittee of the House Committee on the Judiciary.

The Act, if passed, would overturn the 5-4 Supreme Court decision in 14 PENN PLAZA LLC v. PYETT, 556 U.S. ___ (2009), 129 S. Ct. 1456,  upholding arbitration clauses in collective bargaining agreement employment contracts waiving an employee's right to bring statutory claims in federal court.  The Act would also overturn the 5-4 decision in CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC. V. ADAMS, 532 U.S. 105 (2001), approving mandatory  arbitration agreements of employment law disputes in lieu of litigation.

The proposed Act invalidates pre-dispute mandatory arbitration agreements in employment, consumer, franchise, or civil rights disputes.  Support for the Act appears to be growing. The North American Securities Administrators Association supports the Act, although there is some stiff opposition, including the International Franchise Association. 

Views: 58

Comment

You need to be a member of WSBA Alternative Dispute Resolution to add comments!

Join WSBA Alternative Dispute Resolution

Latest Activity

Profile IconKimberly Koch-Hult and Mark Hartenstein joined WSBA Alternative Dispute Resolution
Tuesday
Profile IconJoanna Roth and Michael C. Duggan are attending Helen Ling's event
Thumbnail

2016 ADR Section Annual Meeting at Impact Hub Seattle

September 19, 2016 from 6pm to 7:30pm
Tuesday
WSBA ADR updated an event
Thumbnail

2016 ADR Section Annual Meeting at Impact Hub Seattle

September 19, 2016 from 6pm to 7:30pm
Monday
Clint H Opheikens is now a member of WSBA Alternative Dispute Resolution
Sep 14

© 2016   Created by WSBA ADR.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service