The Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009 is pending in both the Senate and the House. S931 is in the Senate Judiciary Committee and HR1020 is pending in the Commercial and Administrative Law Subcommittee of the House Committee on the Judiciary.

The Act, if passed, would overturn the 5-4 Supreme Court decision in 14 PENN PLAZA LLC v. PYETT, 556 U.S. ___ (2009), 129 S. Ct. 1456,  upholding arbitration clauses in collective bargaining agreement employment contracts waiving an employee's right to bring statutory claims in federal court.  The Act would also overturn the 5-4 decision in CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC. V. ADAMS, 532 U.S. 105 (2001), approving mandatory  arbitration agreements of employment law disputes in lieu of litigation.

The proposed Act invalidates pre-dispute mandatory arbitration agreements in employment, consumer, franchise, or civil rights disputes.  Support for the Act appears to be growing. The North American Securities Administrators Association supports the Act, although there is some stiff opposition, including the International Franchise Association. 

Views: 63

Comment

You need to be a member of WSBA Alternative Dispute Resolution to add comments!

Join WSBA Alternative Dispute Resolution

Welcome

Welcome to our community of ADR professionals: mediators, arbitrators, and lawyers representing and advising clients.  We are active in the growth and development of ADR in Washington as well as the education of members of the bar and the public.

Latest Activity

2 events by WSBA ADR were featured
Sep 12
WSBA ADR posted events
Sep 12
Daniela Ruiz Ferreyra is now a member of WSBA Alternative Dispute Resolution
Sep 11
Teresa A. Wakeen updated their profile
Sep 6

© 2017   Created by WSBA ADR.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service