Information and discussion on foreclosure mediation under Washington's Foreclosure Fairness Act. An open public forum on best practices, current trends, new information.
Open to any registered member of the wsba-adr.org network.
Members: 82
Latest Activity: Feb 23, 2017
See the Resources & Links page to see links to useful resources about foreclosure mediation in Washington, including Commerce's new FFP Guidelines as of January 2015.
Using This Discussion Group
This is an open public forum hosted by the WSBA ADR Section for discussion of matters regarding foreclosure mediation. All opinions and comments expressed in this group represent the views of the individual contributors and do not necessarily have the endorsement of the WSBA, the Alternative Dispute Resolution Section, or the officers or other members of either organization. It is moderated according to WSBA Social Media Guidelines and our Network Rules. Please read Using the Network.
Suggestions
Got a link to some news you want to share? Want to make a quick comment? Just post a comment below. If you have more to say about something, ask a question and get people's answers or opinions, or just want to get a conversation going about something, start a discussion!
Started by Lori Scott. Last reply by Sherman L. Knight Aug 25, 2015. 3 Replies 0 Likes
Hi to all - at the last telephone conference, I asked if any of you have issues with folks not being represented and being pressured by the attorney for beneficiary, to close out in bad faith because of the lack of representation. I was also…Continue
Started by Steve Olsen. Last reply by David K. Hiscock Jun 30, 2015. 8 Replies 0 Likes
I volunteer with the kitsap DRC. I have my first referral from dept of Commerce. The Kitsap DRC was setting up the mediation for me. It's tentatively set for 10/18.However, the bank won't sign the DRC's mediation agreement. their attorney says the…Continue
Started by Sherman L. Knight. Last reply by Jeff Bean Nov 24, 2014. 4 Replies 0 Likes
In the typical case I have, the beneficiary provides an NPV analysis as part of its analysis when there has been a denial of a modification. In only one of my cases has anyone contested the NPV analysis. In that case, the borrower represented…Continue
Started by Jeff Bean. Last reply by Jeff Bean Nov 20, 2014. 7 Replies 1 Like
(Updated to correct expired link to the article below.)King 5 investigations learns there have been a number of lack of good faith certifications. …Continue
Started by Jeff Bean Sep 19, 2014. 0 Replies 0 Likes
Yesterday the Washington State Supreme Court published it's opinion in Frias v. Asset Disclosure Services, Inc.The court was answering two…Continue
Started by Francois Fischer Aug 22, 2014. 0 Replies 0 Likes
Has anyone dealt with the VA preventing a loan modification for a vet by fouling up the vet's benefits? I have a case in which a disabled vet is trying to prevent foreclosure of his house, but can't get the servicer to approve a loan modification…Continue
Comment
Interesting article in the Gray Lady on HAMP:
FYI, I had an email exchange with COM's Brigid H. after her message yesterday about fee disclosure. I asked her if there were some specific, actionable complaints. She said no, there were some general comments from Parkview that some of their "housing counselors have been feeling like this information is not shared with borrowers in as timely and complete a manner as would benefit the parties, especially borrowers". I'm not sure what to do with this beyond the disclosure on page 2 of my notice and emails announcing new sessions. I do have a case at Parkview where the borrower objects to all fees, even if disclosed.
Heads up: If you have not already done business with Shapiro & Sutherland (LOGS,com) as the Be rep, they are located in Vancouver, WA with no local office/attorneys in the King, Snohomish, Pierce area. They are highly resistant (understandably) to making the 5-6 hour R/T drive for what could possibly turn out to be a 20-30 meeting. Be prepared for that possibility.
Query - I believe I heard that in one of the amendment rounds there was a provision that said once a loan was under the FFA, subsequent purchasers must participate and borrowers could not lose rigths by the sale of the note. So I have a case where borrower is delinquent on a HAMP mod, but his finances have now rebounded. The loan has recently been sold and investors say they do not participate in HAMP. Are they bound to or no?
Commerce revised their FFP Guidelines as of January 20, 2015. We'll keep our Resources & Links pages updated with these and other materials.
Seattle University's excellent vid on the foreclosure process.
Found an interesting article on Foreclosures this am. Here is the link, I hope it will take you to the article.
Lots of changes! The 2014 amendments are now codified in the RCWs. Commerce has revised their Guidelines and their Certification form. Check this group's Resources & Links page.
Catch this? There's a full Foreclosure Mediation Track at the Northwest Dispute Resolution Conference this year.
Welcome to our community of ADR professionals: mediators, arbitrators, and lawyers representing and advising clients. We are active in the growth and development of ADR in Washington as well as the education of members of the bar and the public.
© 2021 Created by WSBA ADR.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Foreclosure Mediation Discussion Group to add comments!