Here's a great review of dealing with the lack of settlement authority in the room: Responding When the Other Side Doesn't Have Settlement Authority.

The example is in the context of a catastrophic personal injury, and the narrative often speaks to plaintiffs' counsel, yet even in that it provides good information about how a mediator can approach this situation. It's a useful overview for those who may not have dealt with this issue a lot.

For those mediating under the Foreclosure Fairness Act in Washington, consider that the FFA provides that the mediator may find a party to have failed to participate in good faith by not designating a person with settlement authority to participate in the mediation. The article highlights the constructive approaches that the mediator can take, short of using this statutory "stick," to maintain a productive negotiating environment.

Views: 32

Replies to This Discussion

Jeff,

 

Thanks for your continuing thoughtful posts...

Dana, my reading of the statute is that it provides for payment for services beyond the one 1-3 hour session. If I recall it has the lawyer/legislator's favorite catch-all condition, which is that it be "reasonable."

RSS

Latest Activity

Profile IconKen Lederman and Virginia M. Onu joined WSBA Alternative Dispute Resolution
Tuesday
Melanie Frizzell is now a member of WSBA Alternative Dispute Resolution
Nov 29
Craig Charles Beles updated their profile
Nov 12
Craig Charles Beles is attending WSBA ADR's event
Thumbnail

23rd Annual NWDR Conference at University of Washington School of Law

March 23, 2017 to March 24, 2017
Nov 12

© 2016   Created by WSBA ADR.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service